• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2025 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2025 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2025 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
  • Programs
    • 2025-2026 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • Patricia Numann, MD, FACS, Scholarship for LMIC Surgical Educators
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

Poster2 - 06: NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPING A VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATOR FOR VATS LOBECTOMY
Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, PhD1, Mara Antonoff, MD2, Rishindra Reddy, MD3, Desmond D'Souza, MD4; 1Baylor University Medical Center, 2MD Anderson Cancer Center, 3University of Michigan, 4The Ohio State University

 

BACKGROUND: Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is increasingly used to treat early stage lung cancer. Performing VATS requires extensive training and hands-on experience. Current surgical simulators do not bridge the gap between practice and proficiency. The objective of this study is to conduct a needs analysis study to assess the requirements for developing an enhanced VATS lobectomy simulator.

METHOD: An online survey was used to collect data at three academic institutions. The questionnaire assessed the existing commercial simulators for anatomic realism, interaction, and haptics on a continuous scale of 1- 5. It also assessed various features users would like to see in an enhanced simulator for VATS Lobectomy. Subjects were grouped into expert (attending) and novice (fellow and PGY 1-6). Both descriptive statistics and between group analysis was performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Fourteen subjects responded to the survey (attending, n = 5, Fellow, n = 3 , PGY 1-6, n = 6). 69.2% of the respondents indicated that they never used a simulator for VATS Lobectomy. 23.1 % indicated using LapSim and 7.7% indicated using an ex-vivo simulator model.

Subjects who had used the VR simulator rated anatomic realism, interaction and ergonomics at 3 on a 5 point scale when compared to real patients. For realism of instruments and haptics, the median rating was 3.5.  The results from needs analysis for developing a new simulator is summarized in the table.

There is a current gap in training for VATS procedures and current simulators lack functionalities and procedures that are desired by the survey participants.