• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2025 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2025 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2025 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
  • Programs
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2019 Presentations

PS6-06: INFLUENCE OF GENDER ON ACTUAL AND DESIRED PROCEDURAL SKILL ACQUISITION IN GRADUATING MEDICAL STUDENTS
Monica M Grova, MD, Michael O Meyers, MD; University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

 

Introduction: The influence of gender in desired and actual procedural skill acquisition is not well defined.  We sought to evaluate whether there was any association in a longitudinal study of graduating medical students.

Methods: Under IRB approval, graduating students at a single medical school were queried over an eight-year period via online survey to assess experience as well as actual and desired competence for nine procedural skills (Table). Data were collected on a 4-point scale (4=independently performs to 1=unable to perform) and analyzed by Chi-square and Student’s t-test.

Results: 844 students responded; 427 (51%) female.  Male students were more likely to be pursuing procedural specialties (57% v. 48%; p=0.03) although those pursuing surgical specialties was identical (26%).  Both male and female students reported PGY2 and above residents were most responsible for teaching procedural skills (72% vs. 71%; p=0.94). Both male and female students had a higher mean desired competence compared to actual competence for all skills (p<0.05 for all). (Table)  Men had a slightly higher desired competence for arterial puncture, lumbar puncture and thoracentesis (p=0.02 for all). (Table)  Men were more likely to report a greater number of procedures performed for all skills except Foley placement, basic suturing lumbar puncture and thoracentesis. (Table)  Correspondingly, men were much more likely to have a higher perceived actual competence for all procedures (P<0.001 for all). (Table)  Similarly, male students were more likely to consider themselves independent for all skills except Foley placement and lumbar puncture.

Conclusions: Both male and female students had greater desired than actual competence for all skills.  Male students had greater self-reported actual confidence than female students which corresponded to greater procedural volume. 

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X