• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2025 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2025 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2025 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
  • Programs
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2019 Presentations

PS7-07: VARIABILITY OF THE 2018 MEDICAL STUDENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BETWEEN U.S. MEDICAL SCHOOLS
Ian M Kratzke, MD, Michael O Meyers, MD; University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill

 

Purpose: In 2016, the Association of American Medical Colleges published new recommendations for the medical student performance evaluation(MSPE).  We sought to systematically evaluate compliance with these recommendations across institutions. 

Methods: Applications to a single surgery program in the fall of 2018 were used to evaluate the MSPE.  Documents were searched for adherence to AAMC recommended elements as well as inclusion of comparative information between students and presence of categorization of students. Data were analyzed by Chi-square and Student’s t test.   

Results: MSPE were evaluated from 100 schools (42 private).  Geographic locations: 36 South, 24 Midwest, 15 West and 25 Northeast.  96% adhered to the recommended format.  The average MSPE was 7.7 ± 2.2 pages in length (range 4-15). No difference was seen between public (7.4 ± 2.1) and private (8.2 ± 2.4) schools (p=0.08) with the South having slightly shorter letters (6.9 ±  1.8 vs. 7.9-8.9 pages).  73% included a professionalism assessment. 91% included comparative information about clerkship performance, although only 78% included that in body of the MSPE as recommended. Only 62% included information about how clerkship grades were derived. 59% gave specific summary evaluation criteria and categorization of students (64% public vs 52% private; p=0.31), while 41% did not.  Of the 41 schools that did not, 12 (29%) gave a class rank or other form of academic ranking. 29% gave no comparative ranking of any kind. Of those with specific categorization tiers, all but two had either 4 or 5 tiers.  Mean % of students in the respective tiers was:  23% top tier (range 2-72%), 28% 2nd tier (range 8-69%) and 30% 3rd tier (range 1-70%).   No significant differences existed between public and private schools for any area.  No significant regional differences existed in proportion of schools adhering to any criteria, although the South (50%) and NE (52%) schools were less being likely to provide summative categories than West (80%) and MW (67%) schools. (p=0.06)

Conclusions: Information provided in the MSPE is variable between schools and many do not provide data on professionalism and how grades are derived.  Only ~two-thirds of schools provide comparative ranking of any kind. 

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X