• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2025 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2025 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2025 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
  • Programs
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2019 Presentations

PS9-05: THE IMPACT OF NAVIGATION GRID OVERLAY ON PERFORMANCE OF CAMERA ASSISTANTS DURING LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURES: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
Iman Ghaderi, MD, MSc, MHPE, Eric Hines, Brooke Quinton, McKenna White, Amlish Gondal, MBBS; University of Arizona

 

Background: Camera navigation is an important component of laparoscopic surgery. Inadequate visualization of operative field can potentially compromise the operative flow and patient safety. The operating surgeons rely on their assistants for this task although it is often assigned to less-experienced members of the surgical team. Our aim was to determine whether Navigation Grid (NG) overlaying laparoscopic display monitor could improve camera navigation during various laparoscopic abdominal procedures.

Methods: Patients who underwent laparoscopic abdominal surgeries were randomized to with and without use of NG. The NG from IMAGE1 S device (KARL STORZ Endoskope) was used (Figure 1: A). A pre-defined target area (Figure 1: B) was embedded into recorded videos to provide a frame of reference for reviewers who were blinded to the use of navigation grid in the cases. Primary outcome of interest was the time that laparoscopic instruments were outside the target area (Figure 1: B). Power analysis using two-sided Fisher’s exact test was performed to calculate the sample size and a two-tailed t-test was used to determine the difference between the groups. For robotic assisted cases, only laparoscopic portions were included. Ten percent of collected videos were randomly selected to be reviewed by a second reviewer to establish inter-rater reliability.

Results: Seventy-two procedures were recorded; 36 with NG and 36 without. Nineteen camera assistants participated; 42% were PGY-1. Total video duration reviewed was 22.3 hours. Mean time outside the target area without NG was 335 ± 51 seconds per video whereas mean time outside the target area with NG was 286 ± 79 seconds per video (p= 0.002). Inter-reviewer reliability coefficient for video reviewers was 0.84 (CI: 0.82-0.89). The majority of subjects found the NG easy to use (94%) and helpful to understanding directions by the attending surgeon (76%). Only 38% found it distracting.

Conclusion: This navigation grid overlay improved performance of camera assistant during laparoscopic abdominal procedures. This system may provide a frame of reference for camera holders to better assist the operating surgeons during laparoscopic procedures although it may be perceived as distracting. A larger study with reduced intensities may address this issue.

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X