• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • ASE Pre-Meeting Course Proposal
      • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Exhibits
    • Commercial Promotional Opportunities
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Education Awards
    • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Grant
  • Programs
    • 2025-2026 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
    • Surgeon Empowerment Leadership Fellowship (SELF 2.0)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • Patricia Numann, MD, FACS, Scholarship for LMIC Surgical Educators
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Session Design Submission Review

← Go back

The Gift Nobody Wants: Teaching Learners to Get the Most Out of Negative Feedback

Session TypeWorkshop

Mckenzie Rowe MD
Email hidden; Javascript is required.
The Gift Nobody Wants: Teaching Learners to Get the Most Out of Negative Feedback
Is this submission from an ASE Committee, Task Force, or Working Group?

No

Are you a member of ASE?

Yes

Session Information

Session Description

Feedback is a critical component of the learning process in a clinical setting. During clinical rotations in medical school and throughout residency, the majority of learning takes place through work-based learning, case-based learning, problem-solving, and hands-on practical experience. As such, feedback is crucial to inform residents about their accomplishments and what needs improvement. Although trainees do not have control over who, how, or when feedback is delivered, even “bad” feedback could offer valuable information.

Negative feedback, though necessary, often triggers feelings of stress, embarrassment, humiliation, or anger, likely contributing to the absence of a feedback-seeking culture identified in the clinical setting.

Research shows that a minority of surgical residents report receiving regular feedback and less than half report that feedback is consistently delivered at suitable times and locations, is sufficiently clear or includes actionable plans for improvement. Furthermore, the majority agree that faculty have insufficient skills to deliver feedback effectively, and that peer-to-peer feedback has been identified as a primary source of feedback among residents.

Researchers of feedback in undergraduate medical education note similar challenges, such as general and brief comments, delayed observations, public comments that can be perceived as shaming, and feedback offered in frustration. Although high-quality, evidence-based recommendations for giving feedback are emerging in the literature, an educational gap remains on how to handle receiving negative feedback and the accompanying emotions. Providing trainees with a framework for receiving negative feedback– even poorly delivered–can give them control over their learning, reduce stress and negative emotions, and improve their feedback experience.

This workshop aims to offer educators an approach for teaching medical students or residents how to get the most out of feedback in a way that mitigates the stress reaction and maximizes growth. Participants will observe a “training session” and facilitate their own “training session” using a Feedback Management Framework provided. Small groups will strategize how to integrate the training into their own curriculum.

Workshop Length

90-minute workshop

If a similar workshop is submitted, would you be willing to combine workshops into one session?

Yes

Would you be open to presenting a workshop of a different duration than selected above if needed?

Yes

Course Objective 1

Participants will be able to assess learners’ capacity to manage negative feedback from peers and educators

Course Objective 2

Participants will be able to understand the principles–offered in an actionable framework–of teaching learners to manage negative feedback

Course Objective 3

Participants will be able to generate a plan to engage learners in a workshop about receiving feedback, using off-the-shelf curricula