• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • ASE Pre-Meeting Course Proposal
      • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Industry
      • Exhibits
      • Commercial Promotional Opportunities
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Education Awards
    • Shark Tank: Multi-Institutional Research Grant
  • Programs
    • 2025-2026 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
    • Surgeon Empowerment Leadership Fellowship (SELF 2.0)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • Patricia Numann, MD, FACS, Scholarship for LMIC Surgical Educators
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Session Design Submission Review

← Go back

The Science of Writing a “Good” Letter of Recommendation

Session TypeWorkshop

Vihas Patel MD
Email hidden; Javascript is required.
The Science of Writing a “Good” Letter of Recommendation
Is this submission from an ASE Committee, Task Force, or Working Group?

Yes

Which Committee(s)/Task Force(s)/Working Group(s)?
  • Faculty Development
  • Membership
Session Information

Session Description

In academia, a well-crafted Letter of Recommendation (LOR) is not merely a formality; it can be a critical determinant of a candidate’s tenure and promotion. For surgical educators, often juggling intense clinical demands with administrative responsibilities, crafting these pivotal endorsements of expertise and skill can feel like an additional burden, with variable outcomes due to differing levels of experience and writing acumen.  This session, “The Science of Writing a Good Letter of Recommendation,” is intended to transform this often-daunting task into a strategic advantage for both the writer and the recipient by providing a comprehensive framework that elevates the quality and impact of every letter produced.  The structure and content of LORs will be discussed with an emphasis on what critical information should be included: clinical performance, technical skills, professionalism, research engagement, and leadership potential. Emphasis will be placed on transforming anecdotal observations into quantifiable achievements and specific examples, leveraging the “show, don’t tell” principle that underpins persuasive writing.

The “Science” component will delve deeply into implicit and explicit biases to avoid that can inadvertently undermine an otherwise strong candidate. Participants will learn to identify common pitfalls such as gendered language, “effort” vs. “achievement” bias, the “likeability” trap, and the tendency to over-praise or under-praise certain demographics. We will discuss strategies to mitigate these biases, ensuring every letter reflects a fair, objective, and equitable evaluation of competence and potential, rather than subjective impressions.  The goal is to strategically position a candidate’s experiences to align with the specific values and requirements of target medical schools or professional societies, moving beyond generic praise to powerful, personalized endorsements.

Tools, Skills, and Information Surgical Educators Will Take Back:

Participants will gain a deeper understanding of the critical elements that make an LOR impactful, the ethical considerations inherent in their creation, and the strategic importance of tailoring each letter.

Workshop Length

90-minute workshop

If a similar workshop is submitted, would you be willing to combine workshops into one session?

Yes

Would you be open to presenting a workshop of a different duration than selected above if needed?

Yes

Course Objective 1

The letter writer will understand the anatomy of a reputable letter of recommendation

Course Objective 2

Senior and junior surgical educators will practice de-biasing strategies

Course Objective 3

Learners will audit a collection of LORs to identify writing patterns that might reveal unconscious biases in how different types of candidates are described

Session Outline
Activity Order Title of Presentation or Activity Presenter/Faculty Name Presenter/Faculty Email Time allotted in minutes for activity

1

The Science of Writing a “Good” Letter of Recommendation Introduction

Vihas Patel

vpatel13@northwell.edu

10

2

The Anatomy of a Reputable LOR

Rani Schuchert

schuchertv@upmc.edu

15

3

Practicing De-Biasing Strategies

Sarah Jung

jungs@surgery.wisc.edu

45

4

Recognizing Writing Patterns

Jacob Peschman

jpeschma@mcw.edu

20