• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2024 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2024 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards & Programs
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
    • Visiting Scholar Fellowship
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Nonphysician Professional Educator
    • Educational Materials
    • Collaborative Curricula
    • Getting Started in Surgical Education Research
    • Surgical Education Research Modules
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • Teaching Modules
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

C2B - 06: THE COST OF A “LEAN START-UP” ROBOTIC TRANSABDOMINAL PRE-PERITONEAL INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR IN A SURGICAL TRAINING PROGRAM.
Nathan S Rubalcava, MD, Sharjeel Israr, MD, Jordan Weinberg, MD, Ronald Gagliano, MD, Scott Petersen, MD, Thomas Gillespie, MD; St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

 

The adoption of robotic surgery has been expensive.  Surgical residencies have a responsibility to train residents in leading edge technologies.  We have already paid the price for the extremely steep learning curve of transabdominal extra-peritoneal (L-TEP) inguinal hernia repairs (IHR).  The learning curve to train residents to do robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (R-TAPP) is unknown.  The “lean start-up” methodology is a build-measure-learn feedback loop used to begin learning as quickly as possible when initiating new processes.  Principles include immediate cost analysis, “minimal viable product”, small batch analysis and establishment of a baseline for comparison.  Can applying the lean start-up methodology to training surgical residents have the same results?

A small batch retrospective cost comparison of a single surgical educator’s teaching experience of his “last 12 taught” L-TEPs and his “first 12 taught” R-TAPPs was performed using the “lean start-up” methodology. Total consumable materials cost, including cost of the mesh and “per use” of robotic instruments per procedure was incorporated in the analysis.  So too was “skin to skin” surgical time.  Statistical analysis was performed using a t-test.  Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

24 bilateral IHRs (12 R-TAPPs and 12 L-TEPs) were evaluated.  The average cost per R-TAPP was $1,850.92 and $1659.81 for L-TEP.  Mean cost difference was $230.11. Average case duration for R-TAPP was 149.7 vs 115.4 minutes for L-TEP (p=0.008).

Launching new operations can be hit or miss.  There have been a lot of misses with the advent of robotic surgery.  The cost of acquiring our first 12 taught R-TAPPs was $230.11 and 23% more OR time than our last 12 taught R-TEPs.  This investment negatively impacts the acquisition cost and return on investment.  Using the lean start-up methodology, however, we have demonstrated that robotic surgical training can be accomplished at a lower cost of acquisition and with less increased operating time than previously published.  Lean start-up methodology, which allows for real-time incremental adjustments to processes, may ensure the long-term sustainability of academic robotic programs.

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X