• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2024 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2024 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards & Programs
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
    • Visiting Scholar Fellowship
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Nonphysician Professional Educator
    • Educational Materials
    • Collaborative Curricula
    • Getting Started in Surgical Education Research
    • Surgical Education Research Modules
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • Teaching Modules
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

PS1 - 01: VARIATION OF SURGERY CLERKSHIP GRADES IN US MEDICAL SCHOOLS
Mary R Shen, MS, Michelle R Brownstein, MD, Michael O Meyers, MD; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

 

Purpose: Although many aspects of medical education have become standardized, evaluation and reporting of student clerkships has been highly variable.  We sought to review the spectrum of surgical clerkship grades reported for students in the current application cycle.     

Methods:  Applications to a single surgery program in the fall of 2017 were evaluated.  Surgical clerkship grading criteria, number of grading tiers and percentage of students assigned to each grade tier (when present) for surgical clerkships were categorized.  Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test.   

Results: 91 schools (37 private) were evaluated.  Geographic location was: 33 south, 20 midwest, 18 west and 20 northeast.  One school was pass/fail, all provided a description of how clerkship grades were calculated and 97% provided information about number of grading categories.  Mean number of grading categories was 3.8 ± 0.9; 68% had 3 or 4 tiers.  91% provided a reference range for student performance (96% public v 84% private; p=0.06) .  The mean percentage of students in the top grading tier was 31% ±15% (29% public v 34% private; p=0.11).  Northeast schools (37.8%) were slightly more likely to have students in the top tier than other regions (28.2-31%).  The median percentage was 27% which was slightly higher for private (32%) vs. public (25%).  Only 16% of schools had <20% of students in the top grading tier.  The mean percentage of students in the second grading tier was 45.2% ± 20% (47.3% public vs. 41.8% private; p=0.20).  Taken together, the mean number of students in the top two tiers was 68.9% ± 30.9% (72.6% public v 63.5% private; p=0.17) with 57% having >75% of students in the top two tiers.  There was no geographic difference in the top two tiers (range 65.6%-73.7%); p=NS.

Conclusions: There remains significant variation in surgical clerkship grading between medical schools with 80% of schools having >20% of students in the top grading tier.  Regardless of the number of grading tiers, 57% of schools had more than ¾ of students in the top two tiers.  Consideration should be given to standardizing grading schemes across medical schools.    

 

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X