• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2024 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2024 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards & Programs
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
    • Visiting Scholar Fellowship
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Nonphysician Professional Educator
    • Educational Materials
    • Collaborative Curricula
    • Getting Started in Surgical Education Research
    • Surgical Education Research Modules
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • Teaching Modules
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

PS2 - 04: LOOKS CAN BE DECEIVING: GAZE PATTERN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NOVICES AND EXPERTS DURING PLACEMENT OF CENTRAL LINES
Hong-En Chen, BS1, Cheyenne C Sonntag, MD2, Rohan S Prabhu, BTech1, David F Pepley, MS1, David C Han, MD2, Jason Z Moore, PhD1, Scarlett R Miller, PhD1; 1Penn State University, 2Penn State Hershey Medical Center

 

Introduction: Image guided procedures are commonly performed by surgeons. During these procedures, attention is split between the image (typically ultrasound), and the patient undergoing the procedure. Eye tracking has shown promise as a means to quantify and understand the development of surgical expertise.  The purpose of this study was to assess the homogeneity of gaze patterns of procedural experts, as well as to determine differences in gaze patterns between novices and experts in the placement of central venous catheters (CVC).

Methods: Experts (n=10), residents (n=4), and novices (n=4) in CVC placement completed needle insertions using a simulator. Reported average CVC procedure experience was greater than 200 lines among experts, 20 lines for residents, and no experience for novices. Eye tracking was performed using Tobii Pro Glasses 2 to determine eye gaze patterns. An ANOVA test and Tukey’s pairwise comparison was used to compare differences in gaze fixation patterns between the different levels of expertise. Statistics were analyzed at a significance level of 0.05 using SPSS v24.0.

Results: The mean completion time was 32.9±7.3 seconds for experts, 42.6±8.8 seconds for residents, and 56.7±34.7 seconds for novices. The 18 participants focused on two main areas of interest: the ultrasound screen and tracking the needle and probe. The mean percent of time spent gazing at the ultrasound screen was significantly different (p < 0.020) between experts (75.8%) and novices (51.5%).

Conclusion:During ultrasound guided CVC placement, experts spend significantly more time focusing on the ultrasound screen and less time tracking the needle and probe. This difference would suggest that where one’s attention is directed during the procedure changes as more expertise is gained. Where one should be looking during image guided procedures represents a variable that can be measured, assessed, and taught as part of a curriculum in teaching image guided procedures.

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X