• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2024 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2024 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards & Programs
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
    • Visiting Scholar Fellowship
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Nonphysician Professional Educator
    • Educational Materials
    • Collaborative Curricula
    • Getting Started in Surgical Education Research
    • Surgical Education Research Modules
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • Teaching Modules
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

Poster2 - 06: NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPING A VIRTUAL REALITY SIMULATOR FOR VATS LOBECTOMY
Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, PhD1, Mara Antonoff, MD2, Rishindra Reddy, MD3, Desmond D'Souza, MD4; 1Baylor University Medical Center, 2MD Anderson Cancer Center, 3University of Michigan, 4The Ohio State University

 

BACKGROUND: Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is increasingly used to treat early stage lung cancer. Performing VATS requires extensive training and hands-on experience. Current surgical simulators do not bridge the gap between practice and proficiency. The objective of this study is to conduct a needs analysis study to assess the requirements for developing an enhanced VATS lobectomy simulator.

METHOD: An online survey was used to collect data at three academic institutions. The questionnaire assessed the existing commercial simulators for anatomic realism, interaction, and haptics on a continuous scale of 1- 5. It also assessed various features users would like to see in an enhanced simulator for VATS Lobectomy. Subjects were grouped into expert (attending) and novice (fellow and PGY 1-6). Both descriptive statistics and between group analysis was performed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Fourteen subjects responded to the survey (attending, n = 5, Fellow, n = 3 , PGY 1-6, n = 6). 69.2% of the respondents indicated that they never used a simulator for VATS Lobectomy. 23.1 % indicated using LapSim and 7.7% indicated using an ex-vivo simulator model.

Subjects who had used the VR simulator rated anatomic realism, interaction and ergonomics at 3 on a 5 point scale when compared to real patients. For realism of instruments and haptics, the median rating was 3.5.  The results from needs analysis for developing a new simulator is summarized in the table.

There is a current gap in training for VATS procedures and current simulators lack functionalities and procedures that are desired by the survey participants.

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X