• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2024 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2024 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards & Programs
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
    • Visiting Scholar Fellowship
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Nonphysician Professional Educator
    • Educational Materials
    • Collaborative Curricula
    • Getting Started in Surgical Education Research
    • Surgical Education Research Modules
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • Teaching Modules
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

Poster2 - 09: ATTITUDES OF ROBOTIC SURGERY EDUCATORS AND LEARNERS: CHALLENGES, ADVANTAGES, TIPS AND TRICKS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING ROBOTIC SURGERY
Simon R Turner1, Jessica Mormando2, Bernard J Park3, James Huang3; 1University of Alberta, 2Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

 

Background: Robotic surgery is increasingly important in many specialties. Accordingly, the demand for trainees to learn robotic skills is also growing. As the early-adopter wave of robotic surgeons now trains the next generation, the unique challenges and advantages of robotic surgical education are poorly understood.

Methods: To better understand how robotic surgery is taught and learned, we designed a 43-item questionnaire with 5 domains: challenges and benefits of robotic education compared to other approaches, training methodologies, trainees’ readiness for learning, and robotic surgery education tips. This questionnaire was delivered to surgeons and fellows at a large-volume robotic surgery center in 2017.

Results: 31 surgeons and 20 fellows from 7 specialties responded. Most surgeons had learned robotics on the job or were self-taught. Most fellows learned robotics during residency or fellowship. Both groups supported a wide variety of learning tools and strategies. Most felt that the best time to learn robotics is in residency (84% surgeons, 80% fellows). Teaching/learning robotic surgery was viewed as primarily having advantages compared to traditional MIS by both surgeons (7/9 factors favoured robotics) and fellows (8/9 factors favoured robotics), including speed of skill acquisition and ability of the teacher to control the case. Both groups identified mostly disadvantages compared to teaching/learning open surgery (surgeons 6/9 factors favoured open, fellows 8/9 favoured open), including higher intraoperative risk to patients while the trainee operates. Fellows had more positive views of their own readiness to learn and their learning approaches compared to surgeons’ views of their trainees. Surgeons frequently stated that the greatest challenge to teaching robotics was the need to give complete control of the operation to the trainee. Fellows frequently stated that surgeons who were still in their learning curve had limited willingness to have trainees participate in cases.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a shift from informal robotic skill acquisition by surgeons now in practice toward incorporation in training programs for current trainees. Understanding the unique challenges and benefits of robotic surgical education may allow development of formal training programs that are more effective, responsive to the needs of both teachers and learners, and safe for patients. 

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X