• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
The Association for Surgical Education

The Association for Surgical Education

Impacting Surgical Education Globally

  • About
    • By-Laws
    • Contact the ASE
    • Leadership
    • Past Presidents
    • Standing Committees
    • Global Surgical Education-Journal of the ASE
    • ASE Strategic Plan 2023-2026
  • Join!
  • Meeting
    • Annual Meeting Information
    • ASE Fall Meeting & Courses
    • Call For Abstracts
      • Scientific Sessions
      • Candlelight Session
      • Multi-Institutional Research Submissions
      • Thinking Out of the Box
      • Workshop and Panel Submissions
    • Institutional Members & Sponsors
      • 2024 ASE Institutional Members and Sponsors
    • Exhibits and Commercial Promotion Opportunities
      • 2024 ASE Industry, Foundation and Society Sponsors
      • 2024 Surgical Education Week Exhibitors
    • Meetings Archives
    • Media Gallery
  • Awards & Programs
    • Academy of Clerkship Directors
    • Academic Program Administrator Certification in Surgery
    • 2023-2024 Association for Surgical Education Curriculum in Education Innovation and Teaching (ASCENT)
    • ASE/APDS: Collaborative Grant Initiative
    • Education Awards
    • Multi-Institutional Research Grant
    • ASE DEI Underrepresented in Medicine (URiM) Scholarship Application
    • Surgical Education and Leadership Fellowship (SELF)
    • Surgical Education Research Fellowship (SERF)
      • Surgical Education Research Fellowship Graduates
    • Visiting Scholar Fellowship
    • Ethics of Surgery Fellowship (EthoS)
  • Foundation
    • Donate Now!
    • Foundation Board
    • Honoring Our Surgical Education Mentors and Educators
    • The ASE Foundation: Building for the Future – Donors
    • Deb DaRosa Scholarship Application
    • Dr. Debra DaRosa Career Development Scholarship – Donors
    • CESERT Pyramid Grant Application
    • Spotlight on CESERT Pyramid Grant Awardees!
    • Newsletter
    • Annual Report
    • Review Committee
    • Grants Awarded
    • Corporate Partners
  • Resources
    • Policy for Conducting Survey Research of ASE Members
    • Nonphysician Professional Educator
    • Educational Materials
    • Collaborative Curricula
    • Getting Started in Surgical Education Research
    • Surgical Education Research Modules
    • Surgical Education Research Webinar Series
    • Podcasts
    • Teaching Modules
    • ASE CoSEF Peer Engagement for Education Research Success Webinar Series
  • ATLAS
  • Donate
  • Login

Annual Meeting 2018 Presentations

Poster3 - 05: EVALUATING DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES OF ATTENDING AND RESIDENT PHYSICIANS IN FACTORS DETERMINING RESIDENT AUTONOMY IN THE OPERATING ROOM
Juyeon Park1, Sarah H Parker, PhD2, Shawn D Safford, MD, MAS1; 1Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, 2Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute

 

The Association of American Medical Colleges requires that resident physicians gain “graded, progressive responsibility for the care of patients” with proper supervision throughout their resident years. However in the last few decades, questions have been raised that graduate medical education policy changes have significantly affected resident autonomy. No study thus far has investigated the different viewpoints between attending and resident physicians in what is important to increase resident autonomy in the operating room (OR). Our objective is to investigate the differing perspectives between attending and resident physicians in factors determining resident autonomy in the OR.

A survey was distributed via email to resident (n=9, 37.5% response) and attending physicians (n=10, 35% response) at one institution asking what factors are important in determining resident’s ability to do more in the OR on a 5-point Likert-scale. Bivariate analyses comparing responses by attending and resident physicians was conducted using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Power analysis showed that this study needed a sample size of more than 8 samples per group based on an alpha of 0.05, power of 0.80, and difference in Likert-scales being 0.5.

By both attending and resident physicians, the highest rated factor determining a resident’s ability to do more in the operating room was the attending’s confidence in the resident (attendings: 4.70, residents 4.78, p<0.71, Figure 1). Residents perceived that their PGY level (p<0.0097), their reputation (p<0.0005), their desire to do more (p<0.038), and their length of time on the service (p<0.014) were more important than what attendings perceived the importance to be.

This study demonstrates that several factors were of importance to residents and attendings in determining when a resident is allowed to be more autonomous in the OR. Residents may believe factors they can affect like their reputation or desire to do more are important in affecting their autonomy, but attending physicians believe otherwise. A key factor not highly investigated yet is that of the attending’s confidence in the resident. The focus of surgical education should be refined to improve attending’s confidence in the resident as a possible intervention to increase resident autonomy in the OR. 

Footer

Contact the ASE

11300 W. Olympic Blvd
Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90064 USA
(310) 215-1226
[email protected]

Follow ASE

  • LinkedIn
  • X

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing

The Official Journal of the Association for Surgical Education

Follow GSE on X

  • X